NikolajDanger/bachelor-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

✨

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
NikolajDanger
2023-06-02 18:49:09 +02:00
parent dbc5c1fce4
commit ecf6829582
7 changed files with 102 additions and 46 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
bachelor-project-nikolaj.tex
View File

@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|}\hline
\textbf{Identifier} & \textbf{CPU} & \textbf{Cores} & \textbf{Clock speed} & \textbf{Memory} \\ \hline
Laptop & Intel i5-8250U & 4 & 1.6GHz & 8GB \\ \hline
Desktop & & & & \\ \hline
Desktop & Intel i7-7700K & 4 & 4.2GHz & 32GB \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
@ -309,21 +309,21 @@
100 & 45ms & 0.45ms & 7.2s & 72ms & 0.86s & 8.6ms \\\hline
1,000 & 0.63s & 0.63ms & 17s & 17ms & 5.6s & 5.6ms \\\hline\hline
\multicolumn{7}{|c|}{\textbf{Desktop}} \\ \hline
1 & & & & & & \\\hline
10 & & & & & & \\\hline
100 & & & & & & \\\hline
1000 & & & & & & \\\hline
1 & 0.40ms & 0.40ms & 2.2ms & 2.2ms & 1.6ms & 1.6ms \\\hline
10 & 3.0ms & 0.30ms & 1.0s & 0.10s & 56ms & 5.6ms \\\hline
100 & 25ms & 0.25ms & 2.2s & 22ms & 0.44s & 4.4ms \\\hline
1000 & 0.24s & 0.24ms & 16s & 16ms & 5.2s & 5.2ms \\\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{The results of the Single Listener performance tests with 2 significant digits.}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{src/performance_results/laptop_single_listener.png}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{src/performance_results/single_listener.png}
\caption{The results of the Single Listener performance test plotted logarithmically.}
\end{figure}
Upon examination of the results, an pattern emerges. The minimum recorded response times consistently averaged around 0.5ms per event, regardless of the number of events sent. This time likely reflects an ideal scenario where events are registered seamlessly without any delays or issues within the pipeline, thereby showcasing the efficiency potential of the network event triggers in the MEOW system.
Upon examination of the results, an pattern emerges. The minimum recorded response times consistently averaged around 0.5ms per event for the laptop and 0.3ms per event for the desktop, regardless of the number of events sent. This time likely reflects an ideal scenario where events are registered seamlessly without any delays or issues within the pipeline, thereby showcasing the efficiency potential of the network event triggers in the MEOW system.
In contrast, the maximum and average response times exhibited more variability. This fluctuation in response times may be attributed to various factors such as network latency, the internal processing load of the system, and the inherent unpredictability of concurrent event handling.
@ -338,24 +338,24 @@
\centering
\begin{tabular}{|p{1.5cm}||P{2.5cm}|P{2.5cm}|P{2.5cm}|}
\hline
\textbf{Listener} & \textbf{Minimum time} & \textbf{Maximum time} & \textbf{Average time} \\ \hline
\textbf{Listener} & \textbf{Minimum time} & \textbf{Maximum time} & \textbf{Average time} \\ \hline\hline
\multicolumn{4}{|c|}{\textbf{Laptop}} \\ \hline
1 & 0.63s & 17s & 5.6s \\\hline
10 & 0.46s & 25s & 7.6s \\\hline
100 & 0.42s & 20s & 7.1s \\\hline
1000 & 0.92s & 3.24s & 1.49s \\\hline
1000 & 0.92s & 3.24s & 1.49s \\\hline\hline
\multicolumn{4}{|c|}{\textbf{Desktop}} \\ \hline
1 & & & \\\hline
10 & & & \\\hline
100 & & & \\\hline
1000 & & & \\\hline
1 & 0.24s & 16s & 5.2s \\\hline
10 & 0.24s & 19s & 4.0s \\\hline
100 & 0.25s & 10s & 1.0s \\\hline
1000 & 0.38s & 0.42s & 0.40s \\\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{The results of the Multiple Listeners performance tests with 2 significant digits.}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{src/performance_results/laptop_multiple_listeners.png}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{src/performance_results/multiple_listeners.png}
\caption{The results of the Multiple Listeners performance test plotted logarithmically.}
\end{figure}